Building from Mia’s blog contribution
this week, I can’t help but to think about my recent screening of Quentin
Tarantino’s new film, The Hateful Eight.
What is interesting, and unusual, about the screening was its film projection
(as opposed to digital projection) and the fact that Tarantino filmed it in
70mm film. Not only was film projection an experience that I haven’t
encountered in, at least seven or eight years, but 70mm format has been
declining in use since the mid-century and rarely used since the 1990s. From my
understanding (of my reading of various reviews and news articles), the
advantage of 70mm is its wide format—in other words, its ability to capture
wide shots and to include a lot of landscape in a frame.
The blog question for this week concerns
what insights can be garnered from the process of digitalization (what is
different or lost from the analog representation), which is a question
similarly inflicted my thoughts throughout watching The Hateful Eight. I use the word inflicted because throughout the approximately three-hour film,
form was explicitly on my mind. Some thoughts included, 1) “that wide-angle
shot captures so much of the mountainous landscape”; a thought surely
influenced by reviews and news articles that I read, 2) “an imperfection from
the film projection!” 3) “an intermission! How golden age Hollywood.” Many
these feelings were obviously the desired effect of Tarantino, who is a quick
outspoken of this dislike for digital cameras. Last week’s reading from
Sperberg-McQueen makes an interesting about how the form of the representation
(of a text, film, etc.): “But tools always shape the hand that wields them;
technology always shapes the mind
that use it (p. 34, my emphasis). My consumption of a film reel projection of a
movie made on 70mm film is inflicted by the format. Would I have enjoyed it as
much from a digital projection? Is asking how I would have enjoyed/experienced
the same script filmed on the standard 35mm even worth asking, given how a
format always mediates my experience? The blog post has helped me work through
why it is not productive to examine analog versus digital debates in binary
good versus bad discourse. A representation, in various forms, is much more
complex and can evoke different meanings that ultimately require further
critical engagement. Indeed, especially in our consumption of art or artistic
endeavours, the artist’s use of a given medium offers a wide range of
opportunities to explore how forms affects those who consume it.
References
Sperberg-McQueen, C.M. "Text in the Electronic Age: Textual Study and Text Encoding, with Examples from Medieval Texts." Literary and Linguistic Computing 6, no. 1 (1991): 34-46.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.