As a challenge to myself this week I said, “I will not talk
about digital texts and how the change in medium affects the reading experience”
since I’m sure there will be amble opportunity throughout the term (and since I
have a tendency towards that kind of material generally). Instead, I went to my
bookshelf. However, once I gave the
shelf a once over the one text that
jumped out at me –the one text whose form undoubtedly influences the reader’s
experience – was Marshall McLuhan and
Quentin Fiore’s The Medium is the
Massage: An Inventory of Effects, produced by Jerome Agel. I owe my frequent
use of the term “medium” to McLuhan and the strong influence he and his legacy
had over my undergraduate education in the Book and Media Studies program at U
of T. So, though discussing this book may not be a daunting task, I certainly
think the legacy of McLuhan to both Media Studies and Book History is worth a
blog post.
While in Book History we have Roger Chartier, a well known
book historian and publishing scholar, saying:
“...it
is essential to remember that no text exists outside of the support that
enables it to be read; any comprehension of a writing, no matter what kind it
is, depends on the forms in which it reaches its reader.” (1989, p. 161)
In media studies we find McLuhan echoing a
similar (though more deterministic) statement that
“all
media work us over completely. They are so
pervasive in their personal, political, economic, aesthetic, psychological,
moral, ethical, and social consequences that they leave no part of us
untouched, unaffected, unaltered. The medium is the massage.” (McLuhan & Fiore, 1996, p.
26)
For both Chartier (1989) and McLuhan & Fiore (1996),
the form/medium of a text (thinking of text in a broad sense to include books, film,
photography, computer document, etc.) affects the reader’s experience of that
work.
If you’re not familiar with The Medium is the Massage by McLuhan and Fiore, it’s a really great
visually interesting and somewhat manic introduction to the work and core ideas
you’ll find in McLuhan’s longer works (such as The Gutenberg Galaxy and Understanding
Media). As a physical text The Medium
is the Massage plays with the ideas it discusses in the content. The fact
that this text is “produced” speaks to the character of the work in a nut
shell. This book needed a PRODUCER, just like a blockbuster film. The book is
made up photos (old, new, edited, zoomed WAY in, you name it), comics, excerpts
from literature (Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures
in Wonderland makes an appearance), quotations from other scholars, and
content written by McLuhan and Fiore. All this content works together to bring
the reader’s attention to both the medium at hand, but also the specific media
it discusses throughout.
Because there’s so much going on in this book, I thought I
would share and comment on a couple direct examples you might find interesting.
First, I want to highlight a 2 page spread that forces the reader to physically
interact with the text.
Photo by Abigail Sparling |
The only way to read this spread, unless you’re really good
at training your brain, is to get up from your comfy reading spot and hold the
text up in front of a mirror. By requiring the reader to interact with the text
in an unexpected way, McLuhan and Fiore not only demonstrate the power of the
medium over the reader, but encourage the reader to think about the ways a
medium can shape their reading experience. (Try reading this on your laptop for
instance, I bet it will make you feel silly.)
Another way the book plays with form is by exploiting the sequential
pagination. For instance, the following spread is disrupted by additional
pages:
Photo by Abigail Sparling |
Written in small font on the otherwise blank pages interrupting the spread is “Environments are invisible. Their groundrules, pervasive
structure, and overall patterns elude easy perception” (p. 84-85). Here, the break in between the images is used to reinforce the authors' message and emphasize the inability to fully perceive "environments."
These are just two examples of the creative manipulation of the book's form used to reinforce McLuhan's work on media - the rest of the book is equally rich. Even if you aren't a fan of McLuhan and his work, I would argue that this book is still worth a look. Written content aside, the book's great use of graphic design and it's playfulness with form will likely interest anyone who loves unique books.
For those who haven’t experienced the book you can view it
in full at the following archive.org link (hopefully legally?): https://archive.org/details/pdfy-vNiFct6b-L5ucJEa
Work Cited:
Chartier, Roger. "Texts, Printing, Readings." In The New Cultural History: Essays, edited by Biersack, Aletta and Lynn Hunt, 154-175. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.
McLuhan, Marshall and Quentin Fiore. The Medium is the Massage : An Inventory of Effects, produced by Agel, Jerome. Corte Madera, CA: Gingko Press, 1996.
This is such an interesting work. I had never really considered a book having to be produced in the same way as a film might be, but after looking through this one I understand the necessity.
ReplyDeleteThinking about Chartier’s comment, that the text is dependent upon the form in which it is encountered by the reader, and having looked at the digital reproduction of The Medium is the Massage, I am very curious to think about how my experience might differ with the physical object; of flipping through the pages rather than scrolling through a PDF. I have always been interested to know whether the form in which a reader first encounters a text has an impact on their perception of it when experiencing it in other media (i.e. audiobook, digital facsimile, film adaptation etc.). For example, whenever I hear a modern version of a classic 80s song (because this seems to be happening a lot lately and I really love 80s music) I automatically think of it as “less” than the original. But I wonder if looking through McLuhan and Fiore’s work online right now will impact how I feel about it in general. Will I prefer the original/“authentic” text (material) or will I remain partial to the digital because that is what I encountered first? Interesting to think about…And of course, I love the Alice page!