During my time here
at the iSchool I have written many papers on and about digital texts, digital
textuality and digital reading. Deciding on a topic for my final essay in my
final book-history-related class seems like it has a little more weight than
previous essays – it may be my last chance for awhile to really dig into these
topics. In part this decision is also difficult because I was recently told by
a professor that if you aren’t making your assignments relevant to your desired
career then you are wasting your time. So here’s my dilemma, do I focus on the
practical, or on the theoretical?
I thought I might
propose two ideas and solicit your opinions, so feel free to weigh in in the
comment section!
The Practical:
One topic I’ve been
thinking about, especially as it relates to academic librarianship is the toll
digital texts have taken on library collections and collection development. In
part this has to do with what we’ll be talking about next, specifically digital
rights management. How do issues of access affect both the library and the
reader? What can be gleaned from current academic publishing practices that may
help libraries make better decisions about collection development when it comes
to choosing to purchase a text in print or e-book?
Another way I may
want to approach this topic (though it may move it away from practical
application in the field) is by comparing the stringency of DRM in e-book
publishing to the current rise in self publishing, Creative Commons licensing
and the remixing that occurs online. I really loved the approach Whitney Anne Trettien took in “A Deep
History of Textuality” and the creative way she looked at print-on-demand
books. I also think that the various ways out of copyright books are used in
the online “communication circuit” could stand in stark contrast to the
measures being taken to protect in copyright texts with DRM (Maybe I, like
Trettien, could also talk about another “zombie-like” book revitalization –
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies anyone?). This essay idea is still a little
fuzzy, but I think it provides a lot to work with and could present an
interesting comparative look at the different facets of the modern day
communication circuit.
The Theoretical:
The more I’ve been
thinking about writing on Rief Larson’s Entrances & Exits (from
my week 6 blog post which you can read here) the more interesting a test bed it becomes
for investigating the “future of the book”. Aside from all the reasons
mentioned in my previous post that make Entrances & Exits unique,
one characteristic I am now really eager to investigate is the use of GIS technology
(specifically Google Maps/Google Street View) to map the experience of reading
and a users movement through the text. If you were at the Book History
Colloquium a few weeks back, you will remember the really engaging talks about
the value of maps and mapping to the idea of colonization and decolonization.
Building off some of the insights I gained at the colloquium I think looking at
the digital text as “map” and the way this affects the reader’s experience with
and interpretation of the text could be particularly rewarding, specifically in
relation to the following points:
- The relationship between the representations
of reality (Google Street View), actual reality (the fact that maps
represent their own version of reality) and fiction (the story being told)
- The relationship between way finding and the
experience of reading
- Textual authority – specifically how maps work
to enforce authority and “ground” the text
- The psychology of narrative reading
Now these are just
some rough ideas which may not make their way into my final essay if I choose
to write on Entrances & Exits. I think it may also be useful to
look at literature on video games and how video games work as narratives. I am
not a big video game fan but it may be valuable to look at how they may employ
similar techniques or settings (the ability to move around an environment). Of
course, writing on Entrances & Exits will require me to
read the book. I think I will set aside the hour sometime Sunday – maybe that
will help me make my decision too.
References:
Darnton,
Robert. "'What Is the History of Books?' Revisited." Modern
Intellectual History 4, no. 3 (2007): 495-508.
Larsen, Rief. Entrances & Exits. Editions at Play, 2016. Access at https://editionsatplay.withgoogle.com/#/detail/p_taCwAAQBAJ
Trettien,
Whitney Anne. "A Deep History of Electronic Textuality: the Case of English
Reprints Jhon Milton Areopagitica." Digital Humanities
Quarterly 7, no. 1 (2013):http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/7/1/000150/000150.html.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.